Skip to main content

Table of Contents

  1. Topic pack - Development economics - introduction
  2. 4.1 Economic development (notes)
  3. 4.1 Economic development (questions)
  4. 4.2 Measuring Economic Development (notes)
  5. 4.2 Measuring development (questions)
  6. 4.3 The role of domestic factors in economic development (notes)
  7. 4.3 The role of domestic factors in economic development (questions)
  8. 4.4 The role of international trade (notes)
    1. Role of international trade - introduction
    2. Trade problems (LDCs)
    3. Problems - over-dependence on primary products
    4. Price volatility of primary products
    5. Consequences of price volatility
    6. Price increases can also be problematic!
    7. Price volatility case study - tomatoes
    8. Price volatility case study - copper
    9. Trade strategies for growth and development
    10. Import substitution
    11. Import substitution case study - sorghum
    12. Export promotion
    13. Export promotion case study - Thai toy industry
    14. Trade liberalization
    15. The role of the World Trade Organization
    16. Background information
    17. The Doha round
    18. Case study - trade sanctions
    19. Bilateral and regional preferential trade agreements
    20. Case study of a bilateral preferential trade agreement
    21. Case study of a multilateral preferential trade agreement
    22. Some background reading
    23. Diversification
    24. Case study - diversification
    25. Diversification in Malawi - video
    26. Some background reading
  9. 4.4 The role of international trade (questions)
  10. 4.5 The role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) (notes)
  11. 4.5 The role of foreign direct investment (questions)
  12. 4.6 The role of foreign aid and multilaterial development assistance (notes)
  13. 4.6 The role of foreign aid and multilateral development assistance (questions)
  14. 4.7 The role of international debt (notes)
  15. 4.7 The role of international debt (questions)
  16. 4.8 The balance between markets and intervention (notes)
  17. 4.8 The balance between markets and intervention (questions)
  18. Print View

Case study of a multilateral preferential trade agreement


A multilateral preferential agreement has been established between a number of countries in South Asia. India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan and the Maldives. were the original members of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC). They signed the SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) in 1993, with the intention that member states promote and sustain mutual trade and economic cooperation within the region through the exchange of concessions in terms of reductions in trade barriers.

This preferential trade agreement was the a central element of the next stage of integration that took place in January 2004, when the member of SAPTA signed the Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), creating a free trade area of 1.6 billion people.

One of the questions that is often asked about such forms of economic integration, is the extent to which such agreements yield the benefits to the member states that they were originally intended. There have been a number of studies looking at the welfare and development gains from such agreements. In the case of SAFTA, the impact is subject to debate and reports have highlighted a number of barriers to the successful operation of the agreement and free trade area. Unresolved political tensions in the region such as the conflict between India and Pakistan, and the lack of inclusion of the most commonly traded goods within the agreement are both thought likely to impede the agreement's progress

There is some thought that whilst India may make gains from such an arrangement the smaller and poorer countries in the region may lose out in terms of trade flows, efficiency, and wellbeing. Several countries are responding by resorting to alternative means of trade liberalization. Establishing bilateral preferential trade agreements, such as that agreed between India and Nepal, may represent a more effective route to economic improvement and faster development. At best, it is argued that gains attributable to SAFTA will be small or non-existent for the region. At worst, SAFTA may result in trade diversion and leave some of the poorer countries worse off.


For those that are interested you can follow the link below and look at the terms of the agreement that established the SAFTA free trade area and examine what it intended to achieve.